News from around the World
June 2007
Fire remains potentially the most damaging and disruptive event that
any business has to face. Virtually every fire will result in disruption
to workflows. A devastating fire will almost inevitably lead to loss of
production or productive activity which can lead to a loss of orders, a
loss of customers and a loss of jobs. A significant amount of businesses
simply never recover from the effects of a large fire.
Essentials of fire safety management, written by Dennis Davis is
designed as a comprehensive guide for those responsible for fire safety at
work as a result of the recent changes to UK workplace fire safety
legislation. It draws together and updates a wide range of Fire Prevention
Association (FPA) advice and complements the official government guidance.
Importantly, emphasis is also placed on business continuity planning and
the principles and practices of property protection.
The publication explains in detail the legislative background to fire
safety in the UK, outlining in each of the chapters the relevant
management responsibilities. It comprehensively covers the process of fire
risk assessment, describing what businesses need to do to fulfill their
legislative duties and detailing methods they may wish to employ.
Throughout Essentials of fire safety management, practical advice
sections are included aimed at assisting fire safety professionals, as
well as those without a detailed understanding of fire safety matters, to
comply with the law and to improve business resilience after a fire.
The 116 pages contain 12 chapters. To obtain a copy of Essentials of
Fire Safety Management, 2007. ISBN 1902790464. £34.95
Contact: The Fire Protection Association, London Road, Moreton in
Marsh, Gloucestershire GL56 0RH | Tel: +44 (0)1909 812 500 | Email: sales@thefpa.co.uk
For those seeking further information, guidance and advice including
the full text of the above book why not have a 15 day free trial of FIREINF
- containing over 264,000 records including full text document click onto www.sheilapantry.com/interest.html
UK Health and safety professionals have said that common sense has
prevailed following the 14 June 2007 European Courts of Justice verdict in
support of UK workplace safety law.
The European Commission's claim that the UK had failed to implement the
Framework Directive (EC 89/391) was dismissed by the European Court,
meaning the tried and trusted phrase in UK health and safety law 'so
far as is reasonably practicable' can remain.
President of the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH),
Lisa Fowlie, said: "In terms of health and safety law the clause 'so
far as is reasonably practicable' means that employers don't have to take
measures that are grossly disproportionate to the risk. In turn, the UK
courts are able to objectively assess whether employers have done
everything 'reasonably practicable' to manage the risk. The effectiveness
of this system is supported by the UK's health and safety record, which is
one of the best in Europe.
"Had the challenge against the UK been successful, employers in
this country could have been treated more severely than those in Europe.
Although, other member states' laws are written in absolute terms, the
courts in those countries can apply flexibility and proportionality in
their judgements."
Lisa added: "The UK explained that our whole legal system deals
with health and safety duties and liabilities through a combination of
criminal and civil law. We also operate a social security system to
financially support victims of workplace accidents.
"The Commission failed to show how the UK system couldn't satisfy
the Directive's object of the '...introduction of measures to encourage
the improvement of the health and safety of workers at work'. We hope this
will be an end to these sort of challenges from Europe.
"Health and safety professionals have worked long and hard to
explain the risk-based approach and to win the support of workers and
employers. We feel that had the UK lost so far as is reasonably
practicable, this would have been a major set-back for our sensible risk
message and could have had a negative effect on public confidence in the
system."
IOSH is Europe's largest body for health and safety professionals. It
has over 30,000 members worldwide, including more than 10,000 Chartered
Safety and Health Practitioners. The Institution was founded in 1945 and
is an independent, not-for-profit organisation that sets professional
standards, supports and develops members and provides authoritative advice
and guidance on health and safety issues. IOSH is formally recognised by
the ILO as an international non-governmental organisation. www.iosh.co.uk.
Judgement (Case C127-05): "Having regard to all the foregoing
considerations, it must be concluded that the Commission has not
established to the requisite legal standard that, in qualifying the duty
on employers to ensure the safety and health of workers in every aspect
related to the work by limiting that duty to what is reasonably
practicable, the United Kingdom has failed to fulfil its obligations under
Article 5(1) and (4) of Directive 89/391."
Stress and conflict in the workplace undermine performance and can make
people mentally and physically ill, and research indicates that
ever-increasing numbers of people are experiencing excessive pressure of
this kind - including aggression and abuse - in our rapidly changing world
of work.
This applies to libraries and information organizations as much as
anywhere; indeed they can be particular targets for verbal and non-verbal
violent behaviour through their accessibility to the public, and there are
also employees of such organizations who are suffering, often in silence,
from aggression, bullying and harassment from a work colleague.
Tackling - and preventing - conflict and stress effectively is a legal
responsibility for management, and can result in significant benefits for
the organization in terms of recruitment and retention, employee
commitment, performance and productivity, customer satisfaction,
organizational image and reputation, and avoidance of potential
litigation.
Managing Stress and Conflict in Libraries
defines clearly what should and should not be tolerated in a healthy and
safe working environment, and introduces the reporting procedures and
communication skills leading to conflict resolution, enabling both
employees and managers to consider situations consistently based on risk
assessment previously carried out. The chapters cover:
- Current health and safety concerns
- Are you at risk?
- The business case
- Risk assessment procedure
- Advice, guidance and legislation
- Taking action to solve interpersonal conflict
- Dealing with aggression and violence
- Support to be expected inside and outside the organization.
Also included are case studies, a glossary of health and safety terms,
and sources of further information, including relevant legislation.
This book is essential reading for employees at all levels, and also
for managers, team leaders, supervisors, personnel and human resources
staff, complaints officers, union officers and anyone else in the
information organization who may be called upon to deal with people.
Sheila Pantry OBE BA FCLIP manages an independent information
services consultancy and electronic publishing business, including
websites. She has had a long and varied career in information management
in a range of industry sectors, and also in government as Head of
Information Services for the Health and Safety Executive. She specializes
in worldwide occupational health and safety information and is an
experienced trainer, writer, editor and lecturer.
Managing Stress and Conflict in Libraries
by Sheila Pantry OBE, BA, FCLIP
Facet Publishing, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1E 7AE, UK
www.facetpublishing.co.uk
ISBN 978-1-85604-613-8
All titles available a 20% discount to Chartered Institute of Library
and Information Professionals members.
Remember to quote your Membership Number if claiming the discount.
Available from Bookpoint Ltd, Mail Order Dept, 39 Milton Park,
Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4TD | Tel: +44 (0)1235 400400 | Fax: +44 (0) 1235
832068/861038 | Email: orders@bookpoint.co.uk
| Further information - email: sp@sheilapantry.com
Also www.amazon.co.uk or go
direct to www.amazon.co.uk/Managing-Stress-Conflict-Libraries-Sheila/dp/1856046133
Sheila Pantry Associates Ltd. publish a number of health, safety,
environment and fire electronic services that contain authoritative and
validated information from well-known organisations around the world such
as the Health and Safety Executive, European Agency for Health and Safety
at Work, ILO Health and Safety Centre, Geneva, US National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Fire Service College and UK
Forensic Science Service
These services are constantly updated, contain both full text and
bibliographic information have been transferred onto new, easy-to-use
software and host platform. All services are available for a 15-day free
trial. And the collections contain guidance and advice NOT available on
web sites!
The following services are long-established and are used worldwide by a
wide variety of individuals, OSH practitioners, consultancies,
organisations, universities, researchers and lecturers:
- Fireinf (previously Fire, Emergency and Preparedness)
- OSH UPDATE
- IRISH OSH UPDATE (includes content of OSH Ireland)
Contact Sheila Pantry Associates Ltd. for free trials for all services
that are cost effective. Why pay more for information? For a 15 DAY
FREE - NO OBLIGATION TRIAL contact:
Sheila Pantry Associates Ltd | Tel: +44 (0) 1909 771024 | Fax: +44 (0)
1909 772829 | email: sp@sheilapantry.com
| or fill in the Interest form www.sheilapantry.com/interest.html
Sit in the shade, wear long trousers, a long-sleeved shirt and a hat -
follow this ad-vice and you will spare yourself more than just a painful
sunburn. According to experts, you will also considerably reduce the risk
of suffering long-term skin dam-age such as cancer. The German health and
accident insurance institutions, organisers of the Healthy Skin Campaign,
draw attention to this fact at the beginning of the holiday season.
Suncream with a high sun protection factor should be applied to exposed
parts of the body in order to protect the skin against damage.
"However inviting the beach may seem at midday, a siesta indoors
is the better option between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m.," says Birgit
Schauenburg, skin protection expert at the BKK-BV, the federal association
of company health insurance funds. "For those still determined to
enjoy the sun, a wide-brimmed hat and suitable clothing are absolutely
essential."
Public ignorance on this issue can be gauged from a representative
survey con-ducted on behalf of the Healthy Skin Campaign: whereas 70% of
those questioned frequently or always used suncream, barely 40% protected
themselves against UV radiation by wearing clothing covering the entire
body. Says Birgit Schauenburg: "Animals have fur and feathers to
protect their bodies against burns. By contrast, human skin has only
melanin, the tanning pigment, to protect it."
Sunburn still ruins many people's weekend or holiday. Around a quarter
of those questioned indicated that they often or almost always suffered
sunburn. Birgit Schauenburg advises a healthier respect for the sun.
"The skin needs time to get used to ultraviolet radiation, because
the body is initially slow to produce melanin. Reddening of the skin is
not an intermediate stage to a desirable tan; it is a warning signal that
the skin is already damaged."
For this reason, the skin expert from the company health insurance
institutions recommends that a suncream with a high sun-protection factor
be used in early summer to provide protection against sunburn. At the
sametime, she warns that "the sun-protection factor is not a
cancer-protection factor." Studies have shown that suncream may
prevent sunburn. "It is doubtful, however, whether it is equally
effective in preventing skin cancer." Children need to be
particularly careful, since their skin is still very sensitive. For baby
skin, the maxim to be followed by parents is "Out of the sun!".
Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften (HVBG), Berliner Büro,
Albrechtstraße 10c, 10117 Berlin, Germany | Tel: +030/288763-64 | Fax:
+030/288763-70 | Email: jutta.sieger@hvbg.de
| www.2m2-haut.de
Contrary to 'macho' stereotypes about workers in the construction
industry, a recent work-related health awareness pilot for the
construction industry has shown that it is middle management that needs
the most encouragement to make changes - workers are actually very
concerned about their health.
The study argues that introducing or promoting a culture of health
management within the industry will require workers and management at all
levels to work together.
Published today, a research report of the Constructing Better Health (CBH)
pilot scheme, which worked with more than 360 employers, has shown how
involvement by construction workers far exceeded the expectations of
organisers and employers who were initially sceptical of the interest
among staff.
The report, by independent experts the Institute for Employment Studies
(IES), and funded by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), details how
more than 1,700 workers attended voluntary health checks, and 2,600 went
along to 'toolbox talks', providing training on occupational health
issues. The report was funded by the Health and Safety Executive, which
also part funded and oversaw the CBH pilot, amongst other construction
industry contributors.
The results of health checks demonstrated the importance of health
awareness to an industry with high levels of work-related illness and
workplace injuries, as well as expected future skills shortages. A third
had occupational health issues as a consequence of noise and vibration;
while a third were also found to have general health problems, most
commonly related to high blood pressure or respiratory issues. Overall,
around 600 people needed to be referred to a GP.
Insights into the success of the CBH pilot provided by the IES report
have been fundamental in shaping plans for a national scheme for the
construction industry. Claire Tyers, lead report author at IES, said:
"CBH has been 'myth busting'. There was a preconception that workers
in the industry are irresponsible or not interested in looking after their
health. The popularity of the scheme amongst workers clearly contradicts
such a view.
"There are some managers within the industry who do not want to
scrutinise their work practices, and who are unwilling to accept the need
for organisational-level change. The research showed, for example, that
the training that CBH offered which was aimed at managers was rarely taken
up. These same managers were, however, were often very supportive and
proactive in putting forward their workers for training.
Within construction, complex subcontractual relationships and casual
employment mean that employers often don't really see absence problems as
they don't have to 'foot the bill' for their employees' sickness absence
and therefore don't record it or see it as a problem. Similarly, workers
may feel financial pressures to come to work even when in other sectors
they would be considered too ill to do so, which can store up problems in
the longer term.
"Getting managers more involved is vital, not only because they
are decision makers, but also because communication with the workers
generally only happens with the go ahead of employers. Consultation with
both workers and management about the best way to keep both parties
involved should therefore be a part of any future initiatives."
- The Institute for Employment Studies is an independent, apolitical,
international centre of research and consultancy in public employment
policy and organisational human resource issues: www.employment-studies.co.uk
- The Constructing Better Health pilot was led by industry and funded
by a mix of public and private funding, including funding from the
Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Department of Work and Pensions,
the Department for Trade and Industry, the B&CE, the Association
of British Insurers, UCATT, and the Civil Engineering Contractors
Association. The pilot was carried out in Leicestershire from October
2004 to June 2006. It was designed to test out the extent to which
occupational support for the construction industry could offer
demonstrable benefits. IES worked with the HSE to evaluate the
service.
- The HSE Research Report RR565 (Constructing Better Health Pilot:
Final Evaluation Report, Tyers C, Sinclair A, Rick J, with Lucy D,
Cowling M, Gordon-Dseagu V) is available from the HSE web site: www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr565.pdf
Holiday entitlements can vary by up to 16 days depending on where you
live in the EU, according to research by Mercer Human Resource Consulting.
When added together, minimum statutory annual leave and public holidays
range from as many as 44 days in some countries to just 28 in others.
The average leave and public holiday entitlements across all 27 EU
states is 34 days, with little difference between Eastern and Western
Europe. Employees in Finland benefit from 44 days' holiday, while those in
France and Lithuania receive 40 days. In contrast, staff in the UK,
Netherlands and Romania are allowed just 28 days off. The figures are
based on statutory entitlements for an employee working five days a week,
with 10 years' service.
Mark Sullivan, worldwide partner at Mercer, commented: "Holiday
entitlements are a lottery, with some countries offering over 60% more
days off than others. Even though efforts have been made to harmonise
employment practices in the EU, there are still large disparities in
holiday allowances between the member states."
Annual leave
The minimum number of days' annual leave ranges from 20 to 30. Those
countries that mandate just 20 days (the minimum laid down by the European
Union) include Belgium, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and UK, while
Finland and France give 30 days. The average across the EU is 23 days. In
practice, employers offer more generous leave allowances but this will be
driven by industry and often seniority.
Mr Sullivan said: "While employers are only obliged to give the
statutory minimum amount of leave, many offer extra days to help attract
and retain staff. Generous holiday allowances are an increasingly
attractive benefit, as more employees seek to improve their work-life
balance."
Public holidays
Across the EU, numerous different dates are observed nationally as
public holidays, yet many of these are observed by no more than one or two
member states. This is in addition to the many regional holidays granted
in some states.
There are also wide variations in the local implementation of
employment practices governing public holidays. EU citizens typically have
a statutory right to public holidays, with the exception of France, Sweden
and the UK. Employers in these countries usually grant public holidays,
but they are within their rights to ask employees to work, or take them as
part of their annual leave entitlements.
"Employers trying to co-ordinate business operations across the EU
are caught in a maze of legislation when it comes to holidays,"
commented Mr Sullivan. "Public holidays tend to be rooted in local
tradition or religious beliefs, so it can be difficult to change
practices. With the increasing cultural diversity of the European
workforce there is pressure for greater flexibility around public
holidays."
Special leave
In addition to annual leave and public holidays, employers in some EU
states are required by law to give special leave for getting married, or
for the death of a spouse or close relative, for example. Even when there
is no requirement, many larger employers provide additional leave for
special circumstances.
This research is primarily based on information from Mercer's Worldwide
Benefit & Employment Guidelines (WBEG) reports. The WBEG reports are
available in five volumes (Americas, Asia, Central & Eastern Europe,
Western Europe and Middle East & Africa), which contain
country-by-country information on employment conditions, statutory
benefits and typical benefits practices.
The figures are based on statutory entitlements for an employee working
five days a week, with 10 years' service.
www.imercer.com/wbeg
Working in hot workplaces? Advice for outdoor workers - dehydration and
heat stress.
www.hse.gov.uk/temperature/index.htm?ebul=hsegen/08-may-2007&cr=2
The UK Department of Human Sciences, Loughborough University is
offering the following Masters (MSc) programmes in Occupational Health.
- MSc & PGDip Psychology of Work and Health
- This programme is intended for those wishing to obtain a
postgraduate qualification in occupational health. The programme will
appeal to graduates from a wide range of disciplines (psychology,
biology, ergonomics, physiology, nursing, sociology, social policy,
economics, sport science, engineering). The programme provides
education and training in the application of psychology to the work
environment and the promotion of health at work.
- MSc & PGDip Occupational Health for Safety Professionals
- This programme is designed for health and safety professionals who
wish to develop their expertise in occupational health. Traditional
health and safety training is predominantly concerned 'safety' rather
than 'health' while health and safety professionals are increasingly
having to address occupational health issues at work. The programme
provides occupational health education and training focusing on the
promotion of health in the workplace and management of health related
issues at work.
- MSc & PGDip in Occupational Health
- This programme is aimed at professionals working in occupational
health (occupational health advisors, occupational health nurses) and
other health care professionals (nurses, occupational therapists,
physiotherapists and health promotion practitioners) who wish to
obtain an advanced qualification in occupational health and develop
their research and practitioner skills.
Why choose Loughborough?
- Highest rated university in the 2005 and 2006 national Student
Survey
- Voted No 1 by Students in the 2006 Times Higher Education Supplement
(THES) award in top 5 UK universities for teaching quality
- Strong research base in all departments
- Best value for money research (Higher Education Statistics Agency)
- Unrivalled network of partnerships with industry
- Safe single site campus
- Premier UK university for sport and sport facilities
Award
MSc or Postgraduate Diploma.
Programme Length MSc: 12 months full-time, minimum 24 months part-time.
Diploma: 8 months full-time, minimum 20 months part-time.
Course structure
Student take eight modules from: Environmental Ergonomics; Data
Collection & Analysis; Work, Stress and Health; Health and Diversity
in the Workplace; Contemporary Issues in Occupational Health & Safety;
Workplace Health Promotion; Practitioner Skills; Work, Environment and
Health; Organisational Systems; Occupational Health Psychology.
Assessment
Coursework and examination. The MSc research project is assessed by a
dissertation and viva voce.
Entry Qualification
A good degree in a relevant discipline (e.g. biology, physiology,
anatomy, nursing, health promotion, psychology, ergonomics, management
science, engineering, sports science, physiotherapy, occupational
therapy).
Other qualifications may be recognised and relevant work experience
will be taken into consideration.
Scholarships and Sponsorships
Scholarships (25% fee reduction) may be offered to high calibre
international students.
Selection
Decisions are made on the basis of documents provided. Applicants are
invited to visit the department.
Contact
Cheryl Haslam, Professor of Health Psychology, Department of Human
Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU,
UK | Direct line: +44 (0)1509 223086 | Department: +44 (0)1509 223036 |
Fax: +44 (0)1509 223940 | Email: C.O.Haslam@lboro.ac.uk
|