News from around the World
November 2006
Sheila Pantry, OBE
The following draft legislation will be of interest to readers:
Asbestos at Work
Proposal for a Directive on the protection of workers from the risks
related to exposure to asbestos at work (Codified version) (COM(2006)
664)
Safety of Tractors
Proposal for a Directive on the field of vision and windscreen wipers
for wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors (Codified version) (COM(2006)
651); also parts and characteristics (COM(2006)
662); speed and load platforms (COM(2006)
667) and steering equipment(COM(2006)
670)
The aim of this document is to discuss the formation and operation of a
'Steering Group' in relation to the HSE Management Standards on
Work-related Stress (Management Standards). The primary function of a
Steering Group is to oversee and facilitate the Management Standards
project, effectively acting as a project management group or board.
The Steering Group should serve to guide and give authority to the risk
assessment and subsequent actions. The group should also maintain both the
organisation's and the employees' sense of involvement in the project.
While the exact composition of the Steering Group will need to reflect the
organisation's structure and culture, it should represent the interests of
all key stakeholders, including the employees.
It is important that the Steering Group has authority and credibility,
both will be reflected in the:
- Membership and
- Terms of reference.
The sections in this 8 page booklet give more information about these
two issues.
Health and Safety at Work
Stress management standards steering groups. Advice on setting up a team
to manage stress at work.
www.hse.gov.uk/stress/standards/pdfs/steeringgroups.pdf
[PDF 100KB]
The UK Statistics Commission is an independent public body. It was set
up in June 2000 to 'help ensure that official statistics are trustworthy
and responsive to public needs', to 'give independent, reliable and
relevant advice' and by so doing to 'provide an additional safeguard on
the quality and integrity' of official statistics. It operates openly and
independently, with all its papers normally available publicly.
As well as carrying out research and publishing reports, the Commission
investigates and responds to specific public concerns about official
statistics and works with government departments to improve understanding
of user needs and the governance of statistical services more generally.
www.statscom.org.uk
An estimated 1,300 lives could be saved in Europe each year [1] if
reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes - also known as fire safer
cigarettes - were manufactured and sold, instead of the current standard
cigarettes.
Figures for the UK show that fires started by cigarettes kill more
people than any other kind of fire - accounting for one third of all
accidental fatal fires in the home. [2] RIP/fire safer cigarettes have
been successfully introduced into New York and other states in the USA and
countries such as Canada. To help combat the needless deaths caused by
cigarette fires, a new coalition, called the RIP Coalition, has been
formed in the UK to campaign for the same standard in the UK.
Reduced ignition propensity cigarettes are different from standard
cigarettes as they have ultra-thin concentric bands or "speed
bumps" to restrict oxygen access to the burning end of the cigarette,
causing the cigarette to go out if not "puffed" by the smoker.
Tobacco industry documents reveal that the "speed bump"
production technology has been available for 20 years, but the industry
has chosen not to make these cigarettes for the UK market. [3]
The RIP Coalition [4] is made up of the Chief Fire Officers Association
and fire services across the country, as well as the British Burn
Association, public health organisations and the All Party Parliamentary
Group on Smoking and Health. It is joining forces with the EU RIP
Alliance[5] to push for new legislation to introduce a RIP standard for
cigarettes across Europe, which could reduce the risk of fires by up to
two thirds[6]. This week is crucial, as on Wednesday 15th November the
General Product Safety Directive regulatory committee is meeting to
discuss the introduction of such a standard.
The UK, Ireland, Sweden and Finland are already supportive of this
legislation, as is the European Commission, but support from the majority
of Member States is needed in Europe to ensure that only RIP cigarettes
are manufactured and sold in the UK.
Sir Ken Knight, London's Fire Commissioner and Board member of the
Chief Fire Officers Association, said:
"I am delighted that this new coalition has been set up to work
for European regulations requiring cigarettes to be fire safer. This
standard has already been shown to work in the United Stated and Canada,
and could mean a big fall in the number of domestic fires if it was
introduced in the UK and across the European Union. Far too many people
still die or are seriously injured every year in avoidable fires involving
cigarettes. As far as fire and rescue service is concerned, the sooner the
new standard comes in, the better."
Deborah Arnott, Director of the health campaigning charity ASH, said:
"It's sickening the way much of the tobacco Industry has fought
and continues to fight against the introduction of standards which would
reduce the number of fires caused by cigarettes. It's been twenty years
since the tobacco industry developed the technology to reduce the
likelihood of cigarettes starting fires, in that time thousands of lives
could have been saved. Cigarette-started fires cause death, disfigurement
and distress, which could be prevented by simple design changes. If the
industry won't introduce the necessary changes itself, it should be
regulated, just like other unsafe products."
Dr Keith Judkins, Chairman of the Prevention Committee, British Burn
Association said:
"Fires started by cigarettes lead to a significant proportion of
the 250,000 people we see in NHS hospitals each year with burns. The
injuries from cigarette-started fires may be disabling or deadly, are
always life-changing, and could so easily be prevented - all it needs is a
simple design change in the cigarette. There aren't many causes of fire
which could be significantly reduced simply by better design; it is surely
right to do so whenever possible. It should be a priority of the UK and
the EU to bring in regulation or legislation to help protect people from
these devastating fires. Of course, the best prevention is to give up
smoking, but failing that my colleagues in burn care are convinced this
necessary safety step can be delayed no longer."
Notes and links:
[1] 1,300 across 25 EU Member States calculated by DG Sanco from a survey
of Member States.
[2] Fire Statistics, United Kingdom, 2003, Communities and Local
Government
[3] M Gunja, G Ferris Wayne, A Landman, G Connolly, A McGuire. The case
for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents. TobaccoControl
2002;1:346-353
[4] For more information about the RIP Coalition and its membership see www.newash.org.uk/ash_9pj9up4s.htm
[5] For more information about the European RIP Alliance see www.epha.org/a/2443
[6] www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/E2187-02B.htm?L+mystore+tyfz5125
Contact: Deborah Arnott, Director ASH | Tel: +44 (0)20 7739 5902 | www.newash.org.uk
After her appointment, Dr Chan told the World Health Assembly she
wanted to be judged by the impact WHO's work has on the people of Africa
and on women across the globe.
In her acceptance speech, Dr Chan said: "what matters most to me
is people. And two specific groups of people in particular. I want us to
be judged by the impact we have on the health of the people of Africa, and
the health of women... Improvements in the health of the people of Africa
and the health of women are key indicators of the performance of
WHO."
"All regions, all countries, all people are equally important.
This is a health organization for the whole world. Our work must touch on
the lives of everyone, everywhere," she said. "But we must focus
our attention on the people in greatest need."
Dr Chan was nominated as Director-General on Wednesday, 8 November 2006
by the WHO Executive Board and her appointment was confirmed on Thursday,
9 November 2006 by the World Health Assembly. The Director-General is
WHO's chief technical and administrative officer. She was previously WHO
Assistant Director-General for Communicable Diseases and Representative of
the Director-General for Pandemic Influenza.
Dr Chan obtained her Medical Degree from the University of Western
Ontario in Canada and also has a degree in public health from the National
University of Singapore. She joined the Hong Kong Department of Health in
1978, and was appointed as Director of Health in 1994. As Director, she
launched new services focusing on prevention of disease and promotion of
health. She also introduced new initiatives to improve communicable
disease surveillance and response, enhance training for public health
professionals, and to establish better local and international
collaboration. She has effectively managed outbreaks of avian influenza
and the world's first outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
Dr Chan told the Assembly that as Director-General she would focus on
six key issues for WHO: health development, security, capacity,
information and knowledge, partnership, and performance.
She emphasized the importance of global health security in her vision
of the Organization's role: "Health security brings benefits at both
the global and community levels. New diseases are global threats to health
that also bring shocks to economies and societies. Defence against these
threats enhances our collective security."
Underlining the importance of strong systems to deliver health care to
the people who need it, she said: "All the donated drugs in the world
won't do any good without an infrastructure for their delivery. You cannot
deliver health care if the staff you trained at home are working
abroad."
She especially praised the people who deliver health care. "The
true heroes these days are the health workers with their healing, caring
ethic. They are determined to save lives and relieve suffering, and they
work with impressive dedication, often under difficult conditions. The
world needs many, many more of them."
Dr Chan underlined the diverse approaches needed to strengthen health
and health care in different parts of the world. "Many countries in
Africa face the challenge of rebuilding social support systems. Others in
central Asia and Eastern Europe are undergoing transition from planned to
market economies. They want WHO support. They want to make sure that
equitable and accessible systems built on primary health care are not
sacrificed in the process."
She said she would strengthen WHO's commitment to gather, analyse and
build recommendations based on evidence: "I plan to set up a global
health observatory to collect, collate and disseminate data on priority
health problems. I will integrate WHO's research activities to more
strategically address a common health research agenda."
There is a growing number of initiatives and players in the field of
global health. Dr Chan said she would work strategically with partners to
deliver the best possible results for global health. " Today,
collaboration to achieve public health goals is no longer simply an asset.
It is a critical necessity. WHO needs to develop an approach to
collaboration that emphasizes management of diversity and
complexity."
Turning her attention to the internal management of WHO, Dr Chan said:
"I will also accelerate human resource reform to build a work ethic
within WHO that is based on competence, and pride in achieving results for
health."
She also addressed the challenges ahead of the Organization: "As
we know, not all of the problems faced by WHO in its efforts to improve
world health are subject to scientific scrutiny, or yield their secrets
under a microscope. You know the ones I mean: lack of resources and too
little political commitment. These are often the true 'killers'."
Ending her address, Dr Chan repeated her pledge to work hard to improve
the health of people around the world. "The work we do together saves
lives and relieves suffering. I will work with you tirelessly to make this
world a healthier place."
Dr Anders Nordström, appointed by the Executive Board as Acting
Director-General of WHO in May, will continue in this role until a new
Director-General takes office.
For more information contact: Christine McNab, Acting-Director, WHO
Communications Department | Tel: +41 22 791 4688 | Mobile phone: +41 79
254 6815 | E-mail: mcnabc@who.int
OSH UPDATE www.oshupdate.com -
arguably the most informative collection of health and safety information
at the lowest cost in the world has expanded with another 211,000 records
from the US National Institute for Occupational Safety Health NIOSHTIC
database. This complements the NIOSHTIC-2 database already in OSH UPDATE.
In today's work life, it is important to keep your knowledge in
occupational safety and health (OSH) up-to-date. At the same time, it is
useful to look at your own work and to search for new ideas for the
future. This is where OSH UPDATE can help!
OSH UPDATE is easy to use and links you direct to the latest sources
of information. Keeping up-to-date in worldwide occupational health,
safety, hygiene, road safety, water safety, environment trends and the
very latest information can be time consuming.
Do budget constraints not allow you to buy all the latest journals,
newsletters and documents that contain the latest information? Can't
afford the time to search for the latest information, legislation and
standards? No staff to search for this information? And no time yourself
to spend hours searching for information?
Then this recently launched, very affordable Internet
based service OSH UPDATE, from Sheila Pantry Associates Ltd is the answer
for you.
With this additional NIOSHTICs database OSH UPDATE now contains
about 800,000 records.
OSH UPDATE records has links to the full text
where possible - this is all done for you!
This new aggregation of databases contains thousands of relevant
references with abstracts or keywords and will keep you and your
colleagues alerted to hot topics such as the health risks of
nanotechnology, corporate killing and corporate social responsibility,
bio-terrorism, management of road risks, preparedness and business
continuity and risk assessment.
- Publications from the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work we
have made all the references link direct to full text
- CISDOC the International Labour Office CIS Health and Safety Centre
database has many full text links especially to ILO documents and
to other documents published in the last couple of years
- ILO Recommendations, Protocols and Conventions has all links to
the full text
- European Union legislation has links to full text for the
majority of the references
- UK legislation database - links all the references dated from
1987 direct to the full text - i.e. majority of content of this
database
- UK Health and Safety Executive HSELINE - we have added nearly
2000 full text links to HSE's own documents
- UK Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), starting
to add full text links
- NIOSHTIC-2 US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), strong on full text links -to their own documents and also
to some journals
- Canada Ryerson University RILOSH
- OSH standards specifications including those from the British
Standards Institution.
The title price for a single user via the Internet is
GBP250.00/Euros 360.00 /US$ 450.00 per year - less than 68 pence/1 Euro
/1.2 dollars per day
The price* (see below for further details) reflects our aim to bring
health and safety guidance, Advice, research, journal articles, papers,
standards to the attention of health and safety practitioners and
managers, researchers, trade union safety representatives, occupational
physicians, information specialists in industry, colleges and
universities, government staff, inspectors, university and college
safety directors, university and college lecturers and those in
training - at a cost that is affordable and a service that is time
efficient.
- A user in Poland says "this is a very valuable
collection".
- A user in Finland says "OSH UPDATE it is excellent and easy
to use".
- A Hong Kong multi-user group says "it is what we need to
keep us up-to-date".
- A busy UK consultant says "it is very useful, and saves me a
lot of time from having to search many sources elsewhere".
- A busy UK OSH Information Service says "However hard the
question we can always find an answer in OSH UPDATE".
Why not take a 30-DAY FREE TRIAL of OSH UPDATE and see for yourself?
If you are interested in taking up this service on trial please
email/fax with your details, or contact us to ask further questions or
simply fill in the Interest Form www.sheilapantry.com/interest.html
Sheila Pantry OBE BA FCLIP, Sheila Pantry Associates Ltd, 85 The
Meadows, Todwick, Sheffield S26 1JG, UK | Tel: +44 (0) 1909 771024 | Fax:
+44 (0) 1909 772829 | Email: sp@sheilapantry.com
| www.sheilapantry.com | www.oshworld.com
| www.shebuyersguide.com | www.oshupdate.com
A formal opening plenary session with contributions from the key
political partners will be followed by three Workshop sessions running
simultaneously until lunchtime. Delegates will have a choice of one of the
three thematic workshops.
After lunch, there will be keynote speakers and presentations from some
of the 2006 Good Practice and Video Competition Awards winners with a
closing statement from the European Commissioner for Employment, Social
Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Vladimír Spidla, Presentations to Good
Practice and Video Competition Awards winners will be made at the end of
the afternoon followed by a drinks reception and buffet.
In addition, for the first time, an Exhibition area will show examples
of the activities and events that took place throughout Europe during the
European Week, and there will be opportunities to participate in quizzes
and competitions during the day.
For more information and to register your interest please write with
your full name and contact details to: information@osha.europa.eu
In less than a decade, nanotechnology is predicted to result in $2.6
trillion in manufactured goods annually. Already, there are over 300
manufacturer-identified nanotechnology-based consumer products on the
market-ranging from computer chips to automobile parts and from clothing
to cosmetics and dietary supplements (see: www.nanotechproject.org/consumerproducts).
By 2015, over 2 million workers will be making these and other
nanotechnology products.
But little is known about potential risks in many areas of
nanotechnology-and funding for risk-focused research is a small fraction
of what is being spent on nanotechnology commercial applications. Greater
resources and attention are needed now in order to ensure safe nano-workplaces
today and in the future.
That is the conclusion of Andrew Maynard, Chief Science Advisor of the
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, in a new article,
"Nanotechnology: The Next Big Thing, or Much Ado about Nothing?"
in BOHS's journal, Annals of Occupational Hygiene. His article will
appear in print in January 2007 and currently is freely available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mel071.
It is based on his Warner Lecture, delivered as the opening lecture at
this year's BOHS Annual Conference.
"Because nanotechnology is a way of doing or making things rather
than a discrete technology, there will never be a one-solution-fits-all
approach for nanotechnology and nanomaterials workplace safety,"
states Maynard. "That is why the federal government needs to invest a
minimum of $100 million over two years in targeted risk research in order
to begin to fill in our occupational safety knowledge gaps and to lay a
strong, science-based foundation for safe nanotechnology workplaces."
According to previous analyses done by Maynard, despite investing more
than $1 billion annually on nanotechnology research, current US government
spending on highly relevant nanotechnology risk research is only $11
million per year.
In the short term, because of incomplete information, Maynard stresses
the need to supplement good hygiene practices in the workplace with nano-specific
knowledge. While initiatives such as the ORC Worldwide™ Nanotechnology
Consensus Workplace Safety Guidelines, the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) "Approaches to Safe
Nanotechnology," and the International Council on Nanotechnology
(ICON) "Review of Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology
Industry," provide invaluable resources for working as safely as
possible with engineered nanomaterials, Maynard believes we still have a
long way to go.
Until more research is available, Maynard proposes developing a
"control banding" approach to nanotechnology workplace risk - a
course of action that is between inaction and banning all nanomaterials as
hazardous. This could involve selecting appropriate control approaches
based on a nanomaterial "impact index" centred on
composition-based hazard, and perturbations associated with their
nanostructure-like particle size, shape, surface area and activity, and
bulk-size hazard - and on an "exposure index" representing the
amount of material used and its "dustiness." "This is still
very much at the conceptual stage," says Maynard. "But
unconventional problems need unconventional solutions, and these in turn
will require a serious investment in relevant nanotechnology risk
research."
"The presence of engineered nanomaterials in the workplace today
poses an immediate challenge to how occupational safety and health is
managed," maintains Maynard. "So far, we have a number of 'red
flags' that indicate some might present a new or unusual health
hazard-like recent research done with rodents suggesting that nanometer-diameter
particles are capable of being transported from the nasal region of the
respiratory tract to the brain, and circumventing the blood-brain
barrier."
"While it is by no means certain that this particle size-dependent
exposure route is significant in humans," notes Maynard, "we
cannot avoid the fact that there is an overwhelming level of uncertainty
over which nanomaterials and nanotechnologies present a potential risk,
and why they do. In the long-run, safe nanotechnologies will not become a
reality unless these uncertainties are addressed systemically, and this
means conducting adequate strategic research."
British born, Andrew Maynard is an internationally recognised leader in
the fields of aerosol characterisation and the implications of
nanotechnology to human health and the environment. Dr. Maynard joined the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), part of the
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2000. He was
instrumental in developing NIOSH's nanotechnology research program. In
2005, he joined the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars as
Chief Science Advisor for their Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. Dr.
Maynard received his Ph.D. in ultrafine aerosol analysis in the UK, at the
Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge.
About Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology is the ability to measure, see, manipulate and
manufacture things usually between 1 and 100 nanometers. A nanometer is
one billionth of a meter; a human hair is roughly 100,000 nanometers wide.
The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies is an initiative
launched by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and The
Pew Charitable Trusts in 2005. It is dedicated to helping business,
government and the public anticipate and manage possible health and
environmental implications of nanotechnology. For more information about
the project, log on to www.nanotechproject.org.
Contact: Anthea Page, Communications Officer, BOHS, 5/6 Melbourne
Court, Millennium Way, Pride Park, Derby, DE24 8LZ | E-mail: anthea@bohs.org
| Tel: 01332 250701
|